Back to Resources
Never paste real patient identifiers into Claude -- Before using any prompt, strip out the patient's name, date of birth, chart number, and any other PHI. Use placeholder values or de-identified data only. HIPAA applies to any system where you input protected health information, and cloud-based AI tools are no exception.
Include the AAP staging and grading -- The more specific your periodontal diagnosis (e.g., "Stage III, Grade B, molar pattern"), the more accurate and clinically appropriate the output will be. Vague inputs like "gum disease" produce vague notes.
Always verify CDT codes against your treatment record -- Claude may reference codes like D4341, D4342, or D4910 in the output. Confirm these match what was actually charted and billed. Incorrect code references in documentation can create compliance issues.
Adapt the output to your office's charting style -- Every practice has documentation norms. If your office uses SOAP format, specify that in the prompt. If your practice management software has character limits, add a word count constraint. Treat Claude's draft as raw material to be shaped, not a finished note.
Use follow-up prompts to refine -- If the first draft is too wordy or missing a detail, respond with specifics: "Add a sentence about the localized antibiotic placed at #19 ML" or "Shorten this to 100 words." Iterating is faster than re-prompting from scratch.
5 Claude Prompts for Insurance Claim Narratives
5 Claude Prompts for Patient Education
Claude CoWork for Dental Hygienists
ClaudeDental HygieneBeginnerPrompt Pack
5 Claude Prompts for Periodontal Documentation — Dental Hygienists
Ready-to-use Claude prompts for drafting periodontal treatment notes, scaling documentation, and clinical treatment rationale.
Why Use AI for Periodontal Documentation?
Thorough periodontal documentation is the backbone of defensible clinical records, but writing detailed narratives for every patient visit is one of the most time-consuming parts of a dental hygienist's day. Between probing, charting, scaling, and patient education, there is rarely enough time left to craft the kind of thorough clinical notes that truly reflect the care provided. Claude can generate a strong first draft of your narrative in seconds, allowing you to focus on accuracy and clinical judgment rather than blank-page writing.
These prompts are built around how hygienists actually document. You provide the clinical findings -- pocket depths, bleeding on probing, radiographic findings, tissue descriptions -- and Claude structures them into professional narratives suitable for the patient record. The output follows standard periodontal terminology and can reference CDT codes where appropriate.
It is critical to remember that AI-generated notes are drafts, not final documentation. You must review every narrative for clinical accuracy, ensure it matches what was actually observed and performed, and remove or de-identify any protected health information before pasting patient data into any AI tool. The clinician of record is always responsible for the final chart entry.
The Prompts
Prompt 1: Perio Charting Narrative from Pocket Depths
Turn raw probing data into a readable clinical narrative.
You are a clinical documentation assistant for a registered dental hygienist.
Draft a periodontal charting narrative based on the probing depths below.
Patient context:
- Age: [age], [male/female]
- ASA classification: [ASA I / II / III]
- Last perio charting date: [date or "new baseline"]
- Smoking status: [current / former / never]
Probing depths (facial/lingual, mesial to distal):
- Maxillary right: [e.g., 3,3,4 / 3,3,5 — tooth #2 through #8]
- Maxillary left: [depths for teeth #9 through #15]
- Mandibular left: [depths for teeth #18 through #24]
- Mandibular right: [depths for teeth #25 through #31]
Bleeding on probing sites: [list tooth numbers and surfaces, e.g., #3 ML, #14 DL]
Suppuration: [list sites or "none noted"]
Furcation involvement: [list teeth and classification, e.g., #3 Class II buccal]
Recession: [list sites and mm, e.g., #24 facial 2mm]
Instructions:
- Summarize findings by sextant or quadrant
- Note sites of clinical concern (pockets >=5mm, BOP, furcations)
- Use standard periodontal terminology
- Keep the narrative to 150-250 words
- Do NOT include patient name or date of birth in the outputExample Output:
Periodontal charting was completed on a 58-year-old male, ASA II, former smoker, establishing a new baseline. In the maxillary right sextant, probing depths ranged from 3-5mm with a notable 5mm pocket at #3 mesiolingual, accompanied by bleeding on probing. The maxillary left sextant showed generalized 3mm depths with a 5mm pocket at #14 distolingual and BOP at that site. Mandibular left probing depths were within normal limits at 2-3mm, with the exception of #19 mesiobuccal at 4mm. The mandibular right sextant presented depths of 3-4mm with BOP at #30 mesiolingual. Suppuration was noted at #3 mesiolingual. Class II buccal furcation involvement was detected at #3. Recession of 2mm was measured on the facial of #24. Overall, this patient presents with multiple sites of clinical concern, including pockets of 5mm or greater with associated bleeding and furcation involvement in the maxillary right posterior, consistent with localized periodontal disease requiring further evaluation and treatment planning.
Prompt 2: SRP Session Documentation
Document a scaling and root planing visit with clinical detail.
You are a clinical documentation assistant for a registered dental hygienist.
Write a progress note for a scaling and root planing (SRP) session.
Visit details:
- Quadrant(s) treated: [e.g., upper right (#2-#8) and lower right (#25-#31)]
- CDT code(s): [D4341 / D4342]
- Anesthesia: [type, e.g., 2% lidocaine 1:100k epi, 1.7mL infiltration #2-#8]
- Instruments used: [e.g., Gracey 11/12, 13/14; ultrasonic scaler at medium power]
- Pre-treatment pocket depths of concern: [list, e.g., #3 DL 6mm, #14 ML 5mm]
- Tissue condition at start: [e.g., erythematous, edematous, marginal bleeding]
- Calculus: [light / moderate / heavy; subgingival / supragingular / both]
- Patient tolerance: [good / fair; any issues]
- Post-op instructions given: [yes/no, brief summary]
Instructions:
- Write in standard SOAP or narrative note format
- Include CDT codes referenced naturally in the text
- Note any complications or deviations from treatment plan
- Keep to 150-200 words
- End with next appointment plan (e.g., "Patient scheduled for SRP LL/LR in 2 weeks")Example Output:
S: Patient presented for scheduled scaling and root planing of the upper right (teeth #2-#8) and lower right (teeth #25-#31) quadrants. No new medical history changes reported. O: Anesthesia was achieved with 2% lidocaine 1:100,000 epinephrine, 1.7mL administered via infiltration to the upper right and inferior alveolar nerve block to the lower right. Pre-treatment tissue appeared erythematous and edematous with spontaneous marginal bleeding. Moderate subgingival calculus was detected throughout both quadrants. SRP was performed using Gracey 11/12 and 13/14 curettes and an ultrasonic scaler at medium power. Sites of primary concern included #3 DL at 6mm and #30 ML at 5mm, which received thorough root debridement. A: D4341 was completed for both quadrants. Patient tolerated the procedure well with no complications. P: Post-operative instructions were provided, including warm salt water rinses and avoidance of hard foods for 24 hours. Patient scheduled for SRP of the upper left and lower left quadrants in two weeks.
Prompt 3: Perio Maintenance Note
Document a periodontal maintenance recall visit.
You are a clinical documentation assistant for a registered dental hygienist.
Write a periodontal maintenance visit note (CDT D4910).
Patient context:
- Periodontal history: [e.g., "Completed 4-quadrant SRP on [month/year]; AAP Stage III, Grade B"]
- Maintenance interval: [3-month / 4-month recall]
- Current pocket depths of concern: [list sites >=4mm with BOP]
- Sites showing improvement since last visit: [list]
- Sites stable: [general summary, e.g., "Remaining sites 1-3mm, no BOP"]
- Radiographic findings: [e.g., "Horizontal bone loss #2-#4 stable from prior films"]
- Home care assessment: [e.g., "Fair — heavy biofilm lingual mandibular anteriors"]
- Treatment performed: [e.g., "Full-mouth debridement, site-specific subgingival scaling #3 DL, #19 ML"]
- Patient education topics: [e.g., interproximal aids, technique reinforcement]
Instructions:
- Reference CDT D4910 and briefly justify medical necessity
- Compare current findings to prior visit where data is provided
- Note areas of improvement AND areas of continued concern
- Keep to 150-200 wordsExample Output:
Patient presented for 3-month periodontal maintenance (D4910) following completion of four-quadrant SRP in October 2025 for AAP Stage III, Grade B generalized periodontitis. Medical necessity for periodontal maintenance is supported by the patient's history of active periodontal disease with documented attachment loss. Current probing revealed improvement at several previously involved sites: #3 DL reduced from 6mm to 4mm with no BOP, and #19 ML reduced from 6mm to 3mm. These sites demonstrate a favorable tissue response to active therapy. However, #14 DL remains at 5mm with persistent BOP, representing an area of continued concern requiring site-specific monitoring. Remaining sites are generally stable at 1-3mm with no bleeding. Radiographs show horizontal bone loss at #2-#4 stable compared to prior films. Home care assessment revealed heavy biofilm accumulation on lingual surfaces of mandibular anteriors. Full-mouth debridement was performed with site-specific subgingival scaling at #3 DL and #19 ML. Patient was reinstructed on use of interproximal brushes and Bass technique for lingual surfaces. Next 3-month periodontal maintenance visit recommended.
Prompt 4: Treatment Recommendation Rationale
Draft a clinical rationale for recommending periodontal therapy.
You are a clinical documentation assistant for a registered dental hygienist.
Write a clinical rationale supporting the recommendation for periodontal treatment.
Clinical findings:
- Diagnosis: [e.g., AAP Stage II, Grade A generalized periodontitis]
- Generalized pocket depths: [range, e.g., 4-6mm in posterior sextants]
- Localized deeper pockets: [list specific sites, e.g., #3 DL 7mm, #19 ML 6mm]
- Bleeding on probing: [percentage or description, e.g., "40% of sites"]
- Radiographic bone loss: [describe pattern, e.g., "Generalized horizontal bone loss of 20-30% in posterior"]
- Risk factors: [e.g., diabetes (A1c [value]), smoking [packs/day], medication-related xerostomia]
- Current oral hygiene status: [description]
Recommended treatment:
- [e.g., 4-quadrant SRP (D4341 x4) followed by D4910 at 3-month intervals]
Instructions:
- Explain why prophylaxis (D1110) is insufficient for this patient
- Reference clinical findings that support the diagnosis and treatment
- Use language appropriate for both the clinical record and insurance review
- Keep to 150-250 wordsExample Output:
Clinical findings support a diagnosis of AAP Stage II, Grade A generalized periodontitis, with generalized probing depths of 4-6mm in posterior sextants and localized deeper pockets at #3 DL (7mm) and #19 ML (6mm). Bleeding on probing is present at approximately 40% of sites, indicating active inflammatory disease. Radiographic evaluation reveals generalized horizontal bone loss of 20-30% in the posterior regions, consistent with chronic periodontal breakdown. Contributing risk factors include type 2 diabetes (most recent A1c of 7.8%) and moderate xerostomia secondary to antihypertensive medication. Current oral hygiene is fair, with visible biofilm accumulation in interproximal and lingual areas. A routine prophylaxis (D1110) is insufficient for this patient due to the presence of clinical attachment loss, bone loss, and pockets exceeding 4mm with active inflammation. These findings require therapeutic intervention beyond the scope of preventive cleaning. The recommended treatment plan is four-quadrant scaling and root planing (D4341 x4) to address subgingival deposits and promote tissue healing, followed by periodontal maintenance (D4910) at three-month intervals to manage disease stability and monitor tissue response.
Prompt 5: Tissue Response Evaluation Note
Document tissue response at a re-evaluation appointment.
You are a clinical documentation assistant for a registered dental hygienist.
Write a tissue response evaluation note for a patient returning after active periodontal therapy.
Re-evaluation context:
- Original diagnosis: [e.g., AAP Stage III, Grade B generalized periodontitis]
- Treatment completed: [e.g., 4-quadrant SRP completed over [date range]]
- Weeks since last SRP session: [e.g., 4-6 weeks]
Current findings:
- Pocket depth changes: [e.g., "#3 DL reduced from 7mm to 4mm; #19 ML reduced from 6mm to 4mm"]
- Sites with persistent depths >=5mm: [list or "none"]
- Bleeding on probing: [current percentage or description vs. baseline]
- Tissue tone/color: [e.g., "Improved — pink, stippled, firm marginal tissue in treated areas"]
- Patient-reported changes: [e.g., "Reports less bleeding when flossing"]
- Home care compliance: [good / fair / poor; specific observations]
Instructions:
- Compare current findings directly to pre-treatment baseline
- Clearly state whether the tissue response is favorable, partial, or insufficient
- If sites remain unresolved, note recommendation (e.g., referral to periodontist, localized re-treatment)
- Keep to 150-200 wordsExample Output:
Tissue response evaluation was performed approximately five weeks following completion of four-quadrant scaling and root planing for AAP Stage III, Grade B generalized periodontitis. Comparing current findings to pre-treatment baseline, the tissue response is favorable in the majority of treated sites. Pocket depth at #3 DL has reduced from 7mm to 4mm, and #19 ML has decreased from 6mm to 4mm, representing clinically significant improvements of 3mm and 2mm respectively. Bleeding on probing has decreased from approximately 45% of sites at baseline to 15% at re-evaluation, indicating a meaningful reduction in active inflammation. Tissue tone and color have improved notably, with marginal gingiva appearing pink, stippled, and firm in previously erythematous areas. The patient reports decreased bleeding during home care. Home care compliance is assessed as good, with improved interproximal cleaning. One site of persistent concern remains: #30 DL measures 5mm with BOP, showing only minimal reduction from the pre-treatment depth of 6mm. Localized re-treatment of #30 DL is recommended, with reassessment at the next periodontal maintenance visit in three months. Referral to a periodontist will be considered if the site remains unresponsive.